How to vote via outlook Videos

All the votes are counted... The winning intro is: #2: Glowing Circles! You can now watch the new video on my channel! ;)

Thanks for voting, guys! A message for people who didn't vote so far: Make your decision, before it's too late. ;)

Thanks! Well, I don't want to brag, these intros are not very complicated to make. I've sent you a PM. ;-)

I dont like none of them.. cuz the dumb end is the same!! Change it!

I am voting for 2 .. It is very cool !

I like #4

Yuck

#4

And significant mmmmm I don't think so.

That's odd because when I look at what you just typed there post still fucking opinions? Wow! Who Knew!

+ExodusPlays There's a difference between thinking a significant portion of the population deserves less rights, and liking one type of cereal over another.

+w3irdo13 In other words, everyone has there own opinion, fuckwad.

+xEliteGamingx In other words, you're homophobic.

+w3irdo13 I aint homophobic i just think gay people are weird and it aint right.

+ExodusPlays lol

+w3irdo13 "Im gonna respond to a comment in a sarcastic tone so when he backlashes towards me i'll have something clever to say, and impress everyone!"

+xEliteGamingx "I'm going to say something homophobic on a video about marriage equality and get the expected response! It'll be hilarious!"

+Piotr SzarańskiNo, just showing my ignorance.

+DickJohnson3434 Are you mixing Qbism with Cubism intentionally?

+Thomas Sydney Gissler Gravity

Holy shit well done! You deserve a medal!!! Oh no wait, nobody fucking cares.

+Michael Steshenko That is an interesting thought, as that would disprove this whole theory, but I think the point is that the wave pattern will happen in all universes, what will differ is the final location of the electron on the wall.

+Dumii Cris I meant conventional math does not apply. We don't have a mathematical property to explain the correlation between the wave dot pattern and the single dot pattern.  I been thinking more about this today. The best way to compare what is happening is to think about how we view life itself. Most of us have two eyes, two windows to view reality, just as those two slits, reality collapses into one point of view. If we were blind, reality would exist in multiple dimensions. When we are viewing a movie in "action" we can only view one frame at a time, but when we are not viewing the movie all the movies frames exist at once. 

+Lance Rodrique you're new dimension is done by "x squared" right? so why do you say that math does not apply? how do x squared functions look ? like a wave right? the question u should put yourself is this : the electron reported to my dimension is a wave but what if to a observer from electron's world the electron looks constant.. what makes it a wave for me? in other words if the electron "should" be constant then what else is modifying in it's dimension reported to mine.

+dude Everything can't make since from one perspective. For example, the laws of space can not be defined but the physical science of the Earth. The laws changes when you move into a new dimension. "What goes up must come down" does not apply in space. The subatomic particles, in this case two electrons, either do or do not make a wave pattern. In Algebra, we were taught Functions F(x), Which can be interpreted as a x input gives you an y output. The experiment defiles our basic mathematical reasoning because we plug in a x value (two electrons) and got a different y value so this experiment isn't a function base on math terminology. When thinking about this in depth, I have come to the simple equation. 2x^2 = y and 2x^2 = d, but y does not = d. The observation factor is only a form of measurement that should not change the equation. Example, 12 inches equal 1 foot. 3 feet equal a yard. Therefore a yard should equal 36 inches . The change in measurement should not change the equability. Either the wave pattern and the single pattern are the same or they do not exist at all base on the fundamentals of mathematical properties and functions. The formula for the wave pattern does not solve the equation. It only shows the y output value for the wave pattern but doesn't shows the relationships between the single pattern and the wave pattern. 2 electrons going through 2 slots give 2 patterns on the wall. This is the Identity and Reflection property. 2 elections going through 2 slots, gives a wave pattern isn't a property at all unless the 2 patterns are equal to the wave pattern. Observation reduces the wave pattern into 2 patterns, just like 24/12 is reduced to 2. In conclusion, multiple realities exist but are reduced to a single reality by a single observer.

+dude So true, so liberating!

+William Rahter thanks!

+Panic! In the supermarket i probably prefer cream (but then i usual use powder to set the cream too!) if im going for a full "glam" look hehe! the palette i usually use isnt vegan- its been hard to find a vegan one! Actually if your in Australia or NZ there is a great FB page called "Vegan Beauty Australia/NZ" you should join it!

+F'er MaGee i got this from Lovisa

Absolutely Your videos actually made me want to try wearing makeup. I break out very easily but need a change. I'm getting older & feel so plain. So thank you

+Stacy Hallam Aw thanks so much for your support! xx

+ash trix thanks so much!!