Gerald ford metric system Videos

To link medals/ribbons to the ranking system is basically how ranking worked in Battlefield 2 which introduced ranks in Battlefield. See the requirements for the ranks *(keep in mind that you did not get hundreds of points for nothing back in BF2 ;-) )* //bf2awards.com/ranks/ To reach the high(er) ranks you did not only have to get 4 digit playtime in the game, but actually master every aspect of it. I have made a similar concept a long time ago: //cte.battlelog.com/bf4/forum/threadview/2985968005223967649/

Very interesting system. Titanfall (remember that game??) has a similar system for the regen requirements. You can regenerate only after meeting certain increasingly difficult requirements. Not all of these are teamwork, as most are just specific kills with specific weapons. But the system works similarly, so it could work here. My beef with the Battlefield series is online matchmaking and server balancing. I find myself on too many teams who are just terrible - whether they are new, bad, drunk, or ignorant players. It's true that if you join a server mid-round, you'll often get put on the losing team because of quitters. And bad teams have a steady stream of open spots for new players because of attrition. Some third party skill balancers - if setup correctly - seem to fix this, but it still irritates people to be teamswitched. I'm not sure how that can be fixed. Next, is the ability to have ranked servers in any player configuration up to 64 players regardless of game mode. Go ahead, try to find a populated 32 player Domination server in North America playing DLC maps. They are empty or nonexistent. Yet, you can find plenty of 50-64 player DOM or RUSH servers this size. Those game modes were designed for smaller player counts (and map sizes) and essentially "break" the Battlefield experience. Time to unrank servers that go above suggested player counts for these modes. If you want to rent a 64 player server, play conquest. Or perhaps with DOM or TDM, have "Large" map sizes for increased player counts, like BF2. Finally, let's talk about geographical server regions. It's time to include ping limits - by default - in Battlefield servers. Yes, it will suck to not play with a friend thousands of miles away, but high ping/latency does weird things in FPS games. Pre-ordering has become an interesting (and fundamental) economic model for publishers, but why aren't they taking this data and making game servers available in regions based on pre-order numbers, especially for consoles? South American players of every platform complain about the number and variety of servers, so they flood North American servers...and weird things happen. I think Battlenonsense's proposal of 75 ping is a bit harsh - I'm in the SE U.S. and frequently get 75 ping servers in Texas - but he's in the right neighborhood. OK, I went on too long here...but with your team based ranking system and my suggestions, I think we'd have a hell of a Battlefield game lol.

I would be ok with this or something similar. However I'm not sure how effective it would be. People are going to play how they play no matter how much logic and game design ask otherwise. Do people really care about a cosmetic rank enough to change their habits even a little bit? I'm not sure. The real problem is that Battlefield has become a mega franchise, and you don't get that big without a large majority of your player base being very casual both in their skill level and in their interest in 'playing the game right.' It's a tough problem to solve. Your idea can't hurt. It's how the ranking should work even if it doesn't solve the problem. :)

Thats a very interesting concept. But i don't think, that we will see this in BF4, although I'd like to have it. But a first step of DICE could be, not to reward Kills out of flag Zones, things like Headshot bonus, Marksman bonus ( Don't know if it will be removed for 100% with the next patch)

That turbo is a sweet sound!!!!

Where is Russia going to get money to build this... and keep it operational? Without an economy, you can't field a modern military.

They're only making 12 pak-50 as far as i am aware. So i'm guessing it will be su-27 sea variant. I did hear some where that russia is close to bankruptcy.

The number of pissed of clueless american and british fanboys in the comment section is hilarious