Interesting review. It was nice to see what another viewer thought of the
episode. Regarding the timelord part of Melody/River. I believe the
explanation is that during conception the baby was exposed to the extremely
unpredictable energy of the time vortex. It has nothing to do with the
Doctor himself. So there is nothing, um, taboo, about that situation. :)
Are we going to lose River? Well, we have to eventually. As she gets
younger there will need to be a differect actor. I'd say more but...
Lorna from the Gamma Forests... A lot of ppl thought the Silurian
Maid-Jenny was the real doctors daughter coming back. Refreshing to hear
someone say they liked River-I do too, shes my favorite puzzle as well. The
Silurian said maybe since River/Melody was conceived on the tardis the time
rifts infused or changed her DNA just like it had evolved the real Time
Lords DNA but in a really Sped Up was. Plus he has said Amy was special
sooo many times so..dunno?-GOOD REVIEW I hope we dot lose river!
I loved this episode. I don't think that this will be the last of river
song I think she will be in at least a one more series. I didn't put
together song and melody either until you said it too. The reason I think
she'll be in more episodes is because even though river is coming to her
later years we have all the years of her when the doctor first met her. I
can't wait for the second half of the series. I think Steven Moffat has
planned this since river's entrance into Doctor Who. GENIUS!
Fantastic review. I've watched the latest episode four times, it grows on
me each time. I have a million questions too. One thing from series 5 is
bugging me still. The Dr said he came back for Amy for a reason. Did we
find out what that reason was, apart from her being involved in adventures
so far. I think River must kill the Doctor but every theory I have ends
with the baby regenerating? River is my fav character too, she's almost
delivering every line perfect, love the 1800s scene!
In series 5, they already tell you that the Doctor and River are going to
get married. Amy was talking to the Doctor (the first time Amy meets River.
Sorry I don't remember the episode) and he tells her that River is his
wife. I just think it's crazy that most people fail to remember that. My
best friend didn't, i don't think you did either by the way you talk in
your reviews. That SCREAMED in my head every time I saw Doctor and River
together! Ugh! Intense.
@charlottexemily There's still more to learn about River. The Doctor pretty
much confirmed they have a romantic relationship in the future (You an
I...we...*kissing noises*). She's Rory and Amy's daughter, but she also has
some sort of romantic relationship with the doctor, as we've seen with all
the kissing, flirting etc. What we don't yet know is, what is that
relationship (wife?) and also the large question mark over River knowing
the Doctor's name.
i don't think we'll lose River after this season, because we will have to
see a lot more of her for her to get to the stage of closeness she shares
with the Doctor. the Doctor definitely had kids. Jenny for one is still
alive, but there have been quite a few references to him having children in
the new series. also, we know it for a fact, because his first companion
EVER was his granddaughter, Susan.
Amy, River IS Amy's child. They explained that Time Lord's began by being
exposed to temporal vortex. Since River was conceived on Rory and Amy's
wedding night (which took place whilst traveling in the Tardis), she was
exposed to that same temporal energy giving her time lord abilities. Hence
that is why she (as a child was regenerating at the end of the season's
2-parter) Understand?
I think the whole River saga was planned by the Moff before he took over
from RTD. She has met a few regenerations as she states in Time of Angles,
so she can't leave (unless they don't show us her adventures any more). The
fact that she is part Time-Lady means the Doctor can meet past
regenerations (not future as she's already dead) of her when Alex Kingston
decides to leave.
@SmintsGirl Only unopinionated critics google things first. That'd be a
stupid thing to do. I good FACTS (dates, times, etc, things that one cannot
share an opinion on). This is called opinion, and if I don't understand
something then the show needs to work on explaining things. And yes I did
know it was because she was conceived in the TARDIS, that wasn't my direct
question.
@WillowCreekPictures Also, exciting news that a whole new series has been
commissioned for Matt Smith as the Doctor for 14 more episodes on top of
the remaining six probably 2012 7 +7 plus a Christmas Special 2011 has been
announced. Very exciting. Moffat has a plan, I hope River is in it and I
suspect lots of developments will come out from now until then. Very
exciting!
Your reviews are pretty good but when you don't get really obvious things
i'm sitting at my computer like "ARHGGH" ... The reason river is a bit time
lordy is because when she was conceived the tardis was going through the
vortex and it had an effect. There's loads of other little things you
failed to get but i cba going through them all. Try using google before you
post!
Wreck-It Ralph reviewed by Mark Kermode
Mark Kermode reviews Disney's latest CGI animated adventure Wreck-It Ralph. A video-game villain decides to change his ways and become a hero. Please tell ...
Taken is about a man who will find you. Lifted is a short from 6 years ago
(recent, according to Kermode) shown before Ratatouille. Directed by Gary
Rydstrom, who did loads of Pixar's sound design, so it's very sound design
heavy (prominently features the Wilhelm scream). Rydstrom also did the
sound design on Wreck-It Ralph. The circle is complete. P.S. Don't watch
Lifted on youtube. A few versions with all sound replaced with bad,
user-made stuff. It's on Ratatouille & Pixar Shorts Vol.1 DVDs.
Everything about this movie screams "We know nothing about video games but
lets cash in on their popularity". Sarah Silverman doing one of the voices
says everything about how little they understand -especially considering
most video games have excellent experienced and POPULAR voice actors, who'd
even be cheaper to get- this is just another example of hollywood inviting
it's best friends to the next money-making project.
It's all about fitting 'equal' screen time with each other more or less
which would be difficult to do on a film like this, but yes it would be
nice if ralph's friends ie: the villains. Came in to lend a hand and be
heroes. I remember that on 'who framed roger rabbit' that the only way
warner and diseny lended their characters on screen was to agree that be
both on at the same time.
Yes, thats a common complaint. Some have said there should have been a big
climax with all the famous characters working with Ralph and so on. I for
one liked the film but dont understand why they got the rights to these
characters but dont use them to their full potential besides drawing in
viewers under slightly false pretences by featuring them heavily in
promotion.
Love that Mark enjoyed it despite being a self-confessed "non gamer".As
someone who grew up from Pong through to Far Cry 3 (maybe "grew up" is too
strong a term! lol) the lovely nostalgic touches made it even more
enjoyable (I for example really laughed at the "!" from Metal Gear Solid
being in the "lost & found" at Tapper`s bar) P.S. Firstttttt!
I don't quite understand, what movies or games are being 'misinterpreted'
here? None of the four main characters' games actually exist. Are you angry
at the depiction of Q-bert? Pacman? Pong? As for your other comment, that
Sarah Silverman has an annoying voice is the POINT. She is supposed to be
an annoying brat who does not fit into the game.
I was so bored by this freaking movie. Almost everyone i know loved it and
i'm an avid computer gamer, but the story was simple and predictable and
the characters were dull (even had the annoying kid sidekick like in every
one of these films.) Maybe I need to see it again, but I honestly found it
so tiresome I can't be arsed.
I can't believe more people aren't angry at this disgraceful mess of a
movie. Kermode, if someone made a big video game foolishly misinterpreting
your favourite movies for no reason other than movies are currently part of
popular culture, would you be as angry and disgusted at that video game as
I am of this movie?
I took my little brother to this film expecting me to enjoy it because of
the reference to all of the retro games and him to enjoy it because the
characters 'jump' from game to game. Instead we spent the majority of the
movie in a candyland.
These references and humorous jokes look amazingly unfunny, speaking as
someone squarely within the target audience for this type of video game
movie. But then, I did not care for Monsters Inc (one of only a few Pixar
films I did not like).
What's the short film 'Taken'? that Mark's referring to? Just been to the
BFI screening tonight of Wreck-It Ralph followed by a Q&A with Rich Moore
and Sarah Silverman. Thoroughly enjoyed the film and met Rich after who was
charming!
I really did love the movie. Then again I spend half my live playing video
games so I can kinda relate to it lol.. the other half is spent watching
movies. No idea how I fit work in there....
Doctor Who: A Good Man Goes to War (2011) Review
Happy Friday Everyone! Matthew here and its my turn to review my favourite Matt Smith episode from his tenure and its none other than, A Good Man Goes to ...
this is the episode that I remember the most from Matt Smith's era although
(sorry if I offend you ) but I really hate this story my favourite from the
Matt Smith era is Amy's choice as for me it is an episode that keeps me on
the edge of my seat
@TheInfinityParadox Thank god Goyer and J. Nolan are writing the script,
because that's where Snyder massively falters. I'm a massive Cavill and
Adams fan so I'll be so disappointed if Snyder messes it up. . .
I saw this today, and I wholeheartedly agree with Doctor K's review. I
wanted to like it, but I was bored stiff throughout. And Christopher Nolan
asked Zack Snyder to direct "The Man of Steel"....