Fox news romney israel Videos

• 1. Web exclusive: Jeb Bush on Putin, US-Israel relations
• 2. Mitt Romney Hates Fox News Interview
• 3. Romney's Foreign Policy "Iran , Israel" !
• 4. Hot Scalia Porn. Plus, the Olympics Stops 'Meet the Press' and Romney Defends Israel
• 5. The Young Turks - 5.5.15: Mike Huckabee, Fox News, Mitt Romney, Police Brutality & D.A.R.E.
• 6. Nach Ron Paul: Mitt Romney + CNN. FOX News und Bloomberg: Die Wiederauferstehung - Fake oder Fakt?
• 7. Rush, Fox News Rip Gingrich Over Romney Bain Capital Attacks
• 8. The Last Word - Fox News' bad news for Romney
• 9. Fox News: Who Cares About Mitt Romney Tax Returns?

Web exclusive: Jeb Bush on Putin, US-Israel relations

User Comments

sonsofliberty commented on 02 Oct 2015

jeb bush not being swallowed by Barbara is atrocious

Sonny Loop commented on 02 Mar 2016

clintons and bushes are jews

sonsofliberty commented on 02 Mar 2016

+Sonny Loop ?

Sonny Loop commented on 02 Mar 2016

+sonsofliberty fucking jew man

DaveDaShrubber commented on 20 Aug 2015

If Jeb wants to appear to be pro-Israel, he shouldn't be reminding everyone that Israelis were killed by scud missiles because of his father's treasonous relationship with the Saudis.

DaveDaShrubber commented on 24 Dec 2015

+YoungInsane Jeb is a Saudi agent just like his father and his brother.

YoungInsane commented on 24 Dec 2015

what do the actions of his fathers presidency have to do with him ?

moonvapors commented on 17 Aug 2015

His description of Putin sounds like the f***ing US

Firstname Lastname commented on 02 Feb 2016

+moonvapors Ironically yes. It is disturbing to see these American politicians describe their own country's behavior when they try to vilify Russia. What a pathetic spectacle.

Nicolas Perez commented on 17 Aug 2015

I'm voting for Bernie Sanders, But If I was leaning republican Jeb would take my vote. Much more moderate than his brother,

blackout07maroon commented on 17 Aug 2015

Both of the Bush brothers are products of their handlers... their cronies.

Mitt Romney Hates Fox News Interview

User Comments

ccmanize commented on 03 Oct 2015

So what if single payer would drive the private health insurers out of business. With single payer, there is not need for private health insurers. From the consumers POV, there is no advantage to private health insurance.

Graham Kennedy commented on 09 Dec 2015

+ccmanize In the UK we have a government run healthcare system paid for out of general taxation. And guess what? We also have private healthcare companies, for those that want to use them. They do exist... they're just not giant corporations that tell government what to do.

weunelect commented on 10 Mar 2015

Rupert Murdoch is the most evil man in America. Fox News is the most evil organization in America. Rupert Murdoch owns the Republican party, and has turned half of it's "bought and paid for" members to evil.

weunelect commented on 07 Sep 2015

+I Flick Racist old white people of Fox news. Yes I agree. 

I Flick commented on 06 Sep 2015

+weunelect Rupert Murdoch is the ideological leader of the Republican party.

weunelect commented on 28 Mar 2015

+Patrick Bateman I see, a company that makes better food for the world, won't give you free food. You poor little thing. 

Patrick Bateman commented on 27 Mar 2015

I'm pretty sure Monsanto is the most evil organization in America.

Matt Jones commented on 06 Dec 2014

Mitt Romney was another John Kerry. A rich liberal Massachusetts flip flopper. I was staunchly opposed to him in the 2012 primary and presidential election.

1 ebenezer commented on 05 Sep 2015

+Matt Jones well another greedy little bastard rand paul &you need to go

Matt Jones commented on 25 Aug 2015

+Jake SmithRand Paul opposes Nafta, tpp, aid to Israel, patriot act. He also opposes Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and Yemen. He's also opposed to sanctions on Iran. That's a platform. Trump won't be the frontrunner in February. He's a liberal democrat and I could never vote for Jeb.

Jake Smith commented on 24 Aug 2015

+Matt Jones I'm not sure if you watched the GOP debate, but who seems more radical? With Trump being the frontrunner, the conservatives are a joke to politics. And you think it's hard for democrats to win? LOL. You're living in a fantasy world. Obama won twice because he blew the other candidates out of the water. They had shit policies. And guess what's going to happen in 2016?

Nickuncle commented on 19 Jul 2015

+Matt Jones I don't know about them being radicals. I think that's a bit extreme. I didn't even say the Conservatives were reactionaries.

Matt Jones commented on 19 Jul 2015

+NickuncleIt's hard for democrats to win. Most of them are far left radicals now.

Nickuncle commented on 19 Jul 2015

+Matt Jones It's hard for the Republican party because they're split among themselves. there are still some extreme right wingers battling the moderate ones.

Matt Jones commented on 18 Jul 2015

+NickuncleI didn't vote Romney in the primary or general election. Many conservatives didn't much like McCain. That's why Obama was elected twice.

Nickuncle commented on 18 Jul 2015

+Matt Jones Flip flopper? How do you think someone like Romney could win any primary if he didn't flip on some of his beliefs? To demonstrate some left wing policies is devastating to him.The reason he was on the defensive in this interviewer is that the people watching were the people he needed on his side. Romney pursued exactly the strategy that was necessary to win the Republican vote. He was a very qualified candidate.But I bid you good luck if you ever decide to compete at an Iowa Caucus and say "I support Intl. Health Care" or "I support gay marriage" or "I want abortions"

Romney's Foreign Policy "Iran , Israel" !

Hot Scalia Porn. Plus, the Olympics Stops 'Meet the Press' and Romney Defends Israel

User Comments

John Daniel commented on 31 Jul 2012

In Obama's term, he has given more aid to Israel than Bush did in 4 years. Just today, he gave Israel 100 million to build some defenses Under Obama, Iranian scientists have been assasinated, there have been reports of planting spies in the Iranian government to weaken it, two devastating cyberattacks have obliterated Iran. Crushing sanctions. Crushing sanctions Praise from Israel. Binding the USA to veto any UN resolution that is against Israel, no matter what Israel does What did Bush do?

John Daniel commented on 31 Jul 2012

What foam is there? You implied Obama had disdain for Israel yet on a list of facts you change the subject? Atleast I fact check you liberal dumbass. Take any six of Bush's years and you get more than Obama's four. Who is the revisionist now? For a man who has disdain of Israel (Obama), having sixty percent approval rating in Israel and among Jewish Americans and expected to take seventy percent of the Jewish American vote in the November election, he hides it well.

Brandon M commented on 31 Jul 2012

It also happens to be the right thing to do. When you've got a country that is 5 bad days away from being run by radical religious zealots, whose religion condones murder of jewish people, and is trying to complete nuclear weapons.... Well Israel has a right and IMO a duty to its people to stop that from happening, one way or another. All Romney was doing is voicing what most of us think anyways.

175epi commented on 31 Jul 2012

I think she was alluding to her opinion that anti-Obama ads are racist. Obama is perfect (Chris Matthews said so), to anyone opposing him is an idiot, a racist, or an racist idiot.

bamatecangel7 commented on 31 Jul 2012

Like ElRusbo has explained so well.. Jewish voters, like Black voters are liberal first. So they tend to vote liberal before they vote what may be right or better for themselves.

necrom666 commented on 31 Jul 2012

Great show except for commenting on someones hair style. If i waht to hear about hairstyles, Ill read the tabloids. Sorry can't give this one a thumbs up cause of that.

TheNeaL777 commented on 31 Jul 2012

Scalia: "You don't interpret a penalty to be a pig. It can't be a pig!" You know, you can put lipstick on a pig. . .

UtherPendragan commented on 31 Jul 2012

If the high court calls a fee a tax then we should all call a tax a rock and pay our taxes in rocks.

Zac6230 commented on 31 Jul 2012

I dont get it what did she means( the black woman at the end), sorry I missed that totally

Biff Burroughs commented on 31 Jul 2012

Why did you tip toe around where Scalia said that Privacy is not in the constitution?

IamRayson commented on 31 Jul 2012

Why put porn in the title? And why would we want to see Scalia porn?

John Ratko commented on 31 Jul 2012

Nice of you to notice Wasserman's over use of Brylcreem. lmao

idahopicker commented on 31 Jul 2012

Romney thinks we want more war. Idiot. Obama is an idiot too

The Young Turks - 5.5.15: Mike Huckabee, Fox News, Mitt Romney, Police Brutality & D.A.R.E.

User Comments

David Myers commented on 11 May 2015

Mitt Romney is the worst person in the world everything that's good in a human Mitt lacks. if this guy was ever let off his chain WOW Hitler was nothing compared to Romney.

TK99 commented on 12 May 2015

I have something better. Why don't Republicans try to pander to the black vote? That would be nice wouldn't it?

Ginger Gingercat commented on 06 May 2015

A single joint can get four young girls pregnant? I must be rolling 'em wrong then, eh?

grahepo commented on 18 May 2015

are you people scared of hillary clinton that you won't discuss the book clinton cash

Brian DelGiudice commented on 16 May 2015

How come no cover on Mitt's charity boxing match? In the clip hes in the ring there.

Brian Nyland commented on 11 May 2015

Mitt Romney is the biggest idiot right up there with Mike Huckabee.

EsquizoGenio 1 commented on 28 May 2015

Huckabee is the next Hitler....

AZtrueflow18 commented on 07 May 2015

Huckabee 2016

Nach Ron Paul: Mitt Romney + CNN. FOX News und Bloomberg: Die Wiederauferstehung - Fake oder Fakt?

Rush, Fox News Rip Gingrich Over Romney Bain Capital Attacks

User Comments

dangerouslytalented commented on 14 Jan 2012

@romanmir01 The biggest incentives were the completely out of control uncapped bonuses for executives. Some of them are paid a billion dollars or more, and they will willingly sacrifice long term viability to get the short term profit margin or book value or whatever the metric for their bonuses is.Only certain kinds of mortgages were guaranteed,and the ones by Countrywide were NOT,until they were shifted over to another part of the organisation,which would have been ILLEGAL under Glass Steagall

alexjxcx commented on 27 May 2012

the people that dont like that criticism are the people that understand what private equity firms and realize that companies like BC turn around faulty businesses that were gonna go bankrupt eventually and in fact are responsible for jobs and economic growth- i dont expect fat politician newt or backwards texas hick perry to know jack shit about the private sector let alone obama whose resume includes being a community organizer and spending and amassing more debt than bush and reagen combined

RawIronMix commented on 14 Jul 2012

what you don't grasp is that even if Robney "saved" those companies...he saved the COMPANIES...NOT JOBS. Oftentimes (in their own thinking) part of "saving a company" means KILLING THOUSANDS OF JOBS. Just to (supposedly) "save the company". No, but they just want to make the company RICHER...and have even MORE PROFITS. So don't hand me that old drone-ish line. Rob-ney was NOT a "job creator". That's a laugh. But a job DESTROYER. And no, corporations are NOT "people". But legal money concepts.

Obliviously Aware commented on 12 Mar 2012

Everyone EXCEPT Ron Paul is a Bohemian Grove Sausage smoking, death worshiping, sociopathic ass hole... Stupid f@#$ers just want some sharp cut smooth talking jackass from a "christian background."

Wanderer1200 commented on 13 Jan 2012

I'm not so sure if I agree with the analysis that this helps Romney. These attack adds seem to stick and they have caused a large discussion in the mainstream media about Romney's business past. Coupled with videos now popping up of conservatives saying they would rather vote for Obama than Romney because he destroyed their jobs and Romney's "I like to fire people" gaffe and he is bound to lose some support. It's just that most of his opponents are too weak and damaged to profit from it.

eagles980 commented on 13 Jan 2012

@glddraco666 You didn't look into the video past the title, did you? What is all of this based off of? If anything, Cenk wanted *more* regulation of Wall Street and corporations in general in order to prevent future financial crises. Completely counter to the anti-Keynesian (Reaganomics) economic policy you just said he supported. If you actually watched the video you would know that he was surprised that Gingrich and Perry are rallying against Wall street in order to attack Romney.

justonefirefly1 commented on 16 Jan 2012

@romanmir01 Did you read about the chinese workers who went to the top of the factory and are threatening suicide because of their working conditions and low pay? Oh yeh - they make ipads - gee there might be a shortage of those real soon. All money is counterfeit - there is no real value - none only what men put on it. china will soon have all the intellectual proporties since all the factories are being built there - China has laws and they enforce it against corporations.

romanmir01 commented on 13 Jan 2012

@dangerouslytalented Of-course the banks used Feds money! The banks were given money at a huge discount by the Fed since the "maestro" (and I don't understand why Greenspan was held in such a high regard, must have been the glasses) was giving out counterfeit credit like candy. While some were taking loans to buy homes, some were taking loans to buy businesses, like the Internet businesses, that should not have even started, they were broken from beginning. Same with Romney

romanmir01 commented on 16 Jan 2012

@justonefirefly1 No, there is real money, and it's not even gold, it's production The only real money in trade is value of products, and people set the exchange rates between different products. How many loafs of bread for a new 50 inch plasma TV for example? A gov't PRINTS the money and then this money is used to buy products from people who MADE them, that's counterfeiting of value and stealing of products, it's not trade The Chinese are hurt by GOV'T STEALING from them

RawIronMix commented on 14 Jul 2012

well here the Turkey is proven SO WRONG as usual. He was doubting that Obama would be doing this stuff to Romney that Gingrich and Perry did months ago. When that's EXACTLY what Obama's campaign is doing, and even MORE INTENSELY. (And it's justified in a way). But why was it so hard to believe for the Young Turkey that Obama would be doing this around this time? Bringing up the whole Bain stuff? Arrogant cocksureness makes people many times get EGG ON THEIR FACE.

romanmir01 commented on 13 Jan 2012

@dangerouslytalented As to securitization - this was started with FHA and very much promoted later with Freddie/Fannie, and the fact is that gov't created not just incentives (low interest rates) but imperatives (HUD and FHA and F & F), those entities were guaranteeing mortgages that were high risk from the start, they had MANDATES to guarantee high risk mortgages. Free market does not give out loans like that because risk is unsustainable and it's not gov't money

romanmir01 commented on 15 Jan 2012

@dangerouslytalented slashdot [dot] org/journal/270710/fundamental-fiscal-policy-failure-resulting-in-high-frequency-trading or tiny url: 6bvk8tu I am saying that the gov't destroyed expectation of being actually PAID for INVESTMENT. People aren't buying shares OR gov't bonds to hold and have income streams, they are speculating only, only waiting for prices to move to sell/buy. This is a perverse incentive created by counterfeit money, thanks to the Fed.

romanmir01 commented on 15 Jan 2012

@dangerouslytalented The only supply side economics that exists in USA, is the economics where China is supplying and USA is counterfeiting and consuming. It works well - Chinese productivity and thus standard of living is going up, while US productivity and standard of living is falling. There was never a problem with 'liquidity', it was a problem of debt created by counterfeit money - 0-1% interest rates and no productivity. It's a problem of SOLVENCY.

The Last Word - Fox News' bad news for Romney

User Comments

Piontro Pechetrini commented on 01 Jan 2014

Politicians are the same, they are similar to a cheating boyfriend or girlfriend, they lie and lie and lie and lie and they are believed until is too late.

thespian302 commented on 29 Nov 2015

you're part of the problem of you believe that.

Fox News: Who Cares About Mitt Romney Tax Returns?

User Comments

Joey Carlyle commented on 07 Feb 2012

No, as far as liberals are concerned, the only "good" rich people are the rich people donating money to Obama's campaign. But in the larger scope of things, this squabbling over how much tax the rich pay is useless. It wouldn't make a difference if the federal government took all the earnings of the top 1%, they still wouldn't be able to balance the budget, and they certainly wouldn't be able to honor all their future obligations. There is a spending problem in D.C., not a revenue problem.

shraka commented on 17 Feb 2012

@Joseph565112 Government programs also create a great deal of jobs, yes. Especially in the area of undefined future jobs from projects like infrastructure, and science and technology. Like I said the rich can't magically make jobs. They can only make them based on demand, sometimes creating new markets by leveraging science and technology (which is more often than not publicly funded). And again, the Gov, crowdsourcing, co-ops can all put up capital. The rich are the least important part.

luvcheney1 commented on 28 Jan 2012

@xGapex Buffet could demand a salary. Board of Dir would grant it too, he makes all stockholders money. He does NOT, but IF he did, it would be taxable as ordinary income, at income tax rates, like anyone. Its a cost of business, deducted off Berkshires profit & loss. But, profit left is subject to 29% corp rate, and then dividend sent to Buffet is taxed another 15%, on top. Janitor also pays income tax on wage, and if he owns shares, also pays 15% on dividends (unless real low income)

shraka commented on 15 Feb 2012

@Joseph565112 Like I said the rich don't create the jobs, it's a collaborative effort. Consumers create demand - without this there would be no product. The rich then provide the funds to the working class to create and develop said product, then sell it. The middle class get more money and are then able to create demand for more products. In this process the rich aren't even the most important step - you can gather funding from multiple 'well off' sources rather than one big rich one.

Gašper Gruden commented on 27 Jan 2012

@nextdrink45 Income from money invested IS EARNED INCOME, even if it's not in the form of a paycheck. So what you are saying is that ONLY PHYSICAL work should be taxed so high? You do realize that there is also METAL work (don't know if it's the right term), like intelectual rights, inventions. You don't get a paycheck for them. And I can hire ppl to do stuff for me, and not lift a single muscle, I can still earn. For Romney his money is working FOR/instead of him. It's EARNED INCOME

nextdrink45 commented on 27 Jan 2012

@electronicoffee Oh gee, earlier you said...."As a WRITER and a TAX MAN working for the government." A "writer", hahaha, of what?? Kids cartoons that you get NO work from so you need to suck off the government. Or are you an "artist" who also relys heavily on the government?? Oh that's right, you work for the government. That explains it all right there DUMBASS!!!!!! Now FUCK YOU and your want to tax the rich even more,so they can move and take their money with them DICKHEAD!

luvcheney1 commented on 27 Jan 2012

@johnedwards1968 IRS on S-Corps (which pay 0% corp taxes, profit passed to owner, taxed at personal tax rates.) "S corps are corps that pass corp income, losses, deductions through to their shareholders for federal tax purposes. Shareholders of S corps report flow-through of income & losses on their personal tax returns and are assessed tax at their individual income tax rates. This allows S corporations to avoid double taxation on the corporate income." AVOID DOUBLE TAXATION

luvcheney1 commented on 27 Jan 2012

@xGapex You dont know taxes. Warren Buffet says his secretary pays less than he does, Obama says so too, and every Lib. But, Buffet`s Corp, Berkshire Hathaway paid 29% tax in 2010. So, Buffet`s corp makes a dollar, and gets to keep 71 cents, which it sends as a dividend to Buffet, where it is taxed again at "only" 15%. So basically, of one dollar earned, Govt gets 40 cents, Buffet gets 60 cents. Then, he and Obama say they pay only "15%". Only IDIOTS believe this nonsense.

luvcheney1 commented on 01 Feb 2012

@xGapex Many corporations are owned outright by people, like doctors, lawyers, etc. They organize in a way there is zero corp income tax. They CAN take straight out of the company money, and it is taxed as personal income, like a common worker. Then, there isnt a cap gains tax, just personal income. But, big corps go through corp income taxes, and then when owners get money its taxed again as cap gains. This is the 1st time it gets into the hands of a HUMAN BEING to keep.

Gašper Gruden commented on 27 Jan 2012

@nextdrink45 Ok, I can't say I'll use the right terms, but here it goes. Economy teaches us (this is VERY simplified) that in industry you can INVEST 3 things into the final product. Work, Land and Capital. There are 3 types of work. Physical (paycheck), intellectual (Royalties) or smart business deals/trading (profit?), for Land you get a rent and for capital you get Interest. So what's the difference. Some invest money, some time/energy. there should be no difference

Gašper Gruden commented on 28 Jan 2012

@luvcheney1 No one has HIS own money taxed two times. The COMPANY makes that dollar you keep talking about. Yes in reality ppl make it, but a company is a bunch of people. It makes it with it's own money. So the company has it's 1 dollar taxed, and when it changes hands (Buffet get's paid) it gets taxed again. If it changes hands again (pay someone for his services), it gets taxed again. is that triple taxation? And this can go on forever. So we can have 99x taxation.

nextdrink45 commented on 26 Jan 2012

@nextdrink45 The fucking government DOES NOT have a revenue problem......it has a fucking SPENDING problem!!! Taxing the rich more IS NOT going to solve the problem because their TAXABLE income varies widely. So widely, that it's NOT a dependable source of revenue!!! The government needs to STOP spending the money they DON'T have!!!!!! I'm bored with you now so I must go. But finally, people like you are like mind over matter....I don't mind, and YOU don't matter!!!!

Joseph565112 commented on 15 Feb 2012

@shraka You're leaving out a very important element here...the government. Government have been setting objectives, financing wars etc, forcing private business to innovate to meet the need of the war effort, get contracts, etc. Individuals create demand for basic necessities, nothing else. This computer and internet you're using came from government objectives - the Apollo program and the cold war, more generally. The rich certainly do create jobs, it takes capital.