Car bows.com Videos

+Josh Araujo preach brother

I believe this was an impromptu performance. It wasn't recorded in a professional studio like the version on the album. I actually prefer this one because it's more raw. That's just my style though. The studio version is still magical.

Like Shit. Shitty on my arm this is really good.

I think this was an impromptu performance. It sounds like the production was post recording.

+Joe I Yes. I saw him in 2013 for $12 and again last year for $25. It's super nice haha

+Ashley Marlow I prefer it that way too so the concert ticket prices aren't super high. I've seen this guy play in 3 different states (soon to be 4 for his Portland show) so the lower tickets help the high travel costs

+santaclara84 I surely hope so. :)

+Ashley Marlow Like The National in 2007. Give it time, I think he'll be there soon enough :)

+santaclara84 Is his ass made of silicone? No? Thats why.

He's too much of a genius to be appreciated by the masses. I actually prefer it that way, but at the same time I want everyone to know of him. The struggle haha

+santaclara84 rarely is anyone worth knowing well known.

Don't worry I'm just getting warmed up, I've got a new vid in the works for the next day or so. ^_^

Aha! Hi Jonas! And thank you for starring! Hope to bump into you again.

Thanks Kat! I would gladly use such a service, and I hear TARP is now actually a valid payment method thanks to the US government!

Splendid! Even if I cover a game that you don't like, my aim is that you will still enjoy the video.

Perchance we have stumbled upon a secret society of altruistic gun donors?

Beware them snipers!

+Eamon Campbell-June Based on my experience of both games, I would say yes. H1Z1 is very solid, I have never experienced any lag or syncing issues and the VOIP is excellent, you can actually communicate with other players properly which I think has prevented a lot of KOS incidents for me.

+SHADOWFRAX Would you say H1Z1 is more stable than dayz standalone?

Thanks Max, glad you appreciated it.

+Cardinal Biggles In front of paedophile zionist contolled courts- probably not. Does that mean it's wrong or the court is corrupt?

+Mal Private Automobile/Private convenience... just look up legal definitions, its important to know so you dont accidentally sign any verbal agreements

+Rayvn7 That is where the man to man lawsuit under savings to suitors clause comes in

Loved that.

Oh before anybody asks I live in the USA.

The cops will do what they CHOOSE to do, that goes for any country. We must stay in honor and wait to take our claim to court, if the judge is honest it will be discharged. Judges know common law and If you know who and what you are they will do the right thing. COPS not so much

+SriLankerC                            Hi SrilankerC, No, it's not that one, I've checked my history and found it, it's called "Cop stop freeman" but be careful you don't try to punch your monitor screen! I felt like doing just that!!

+Tybok C"Actually there's 2 elements to crime. To think of doing a crime. Then do the act.I disagree. Unless there is loss or harm to a man or woman then there would be no one to make the claim against you in court.Wiki:Mens reaactus reusCausationThen of course they has to be jurisdiction.//www.cliffsnotes.com/more-subjects/criminal-justice/criminal-law/legal-elements-of-a-crimeNo crime without lawNo crime without a criminal actNo crime without intentNo crime without concurrenceAnd again jurisdiction.However if you think there can be a victimless crime then you are in the world of Statute Law.

+101TonyParker Actually there's 2 elements to crime. To think of doing a crime. Then do the act. If neither is the case then no crime has taken place.

Ask him what Statute you broke and when he reads it out it will usually contain two words, person and shall.Ask him to prove you are a person then ask what tense is shall? (Karl Lentz)Then asked him to prove you committed a crime because if he pulled you over without reasonable articulate suspicion of a crime being committed then he violated your rights under the Human Rights Act and it is a common law crime (Misconduct in Public Office) for a Constable to breech a Legislative Act.Four elements of a crime1 Break a Law2 Understand you are breaking it at the time you do it3 Harm someone doing it. ( Did you harm anyone? Did he have a verified criminal complaint?)4 Jurisdiction. ( You exist in the real world he only has jurisdiction in the fictional world when executing Statutes.)Also look up Marc Stevens and he will show you how to asked questions in court.Also if the summons you receive is not signed by a judge (and it never is) then you have who ever issued it for abuse of process for using fraudulent documents.County Courts Act 198413.5 Penalty for falsely pretending to act under authority of court.Any person who—(a)delivers or causes to be delivered to any other person any paper falsely purporting to be a copy of any summons or other process of a county court, knowing it to be false; or(b)acts or professes to act under any false colour or pretence of the process or authority of a county court; shall be guilty of an offence and shall for each offence be liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years. The Rules of the Court of Judicature (NI) 1980ORDER 42 – JUDGMENTInterpretation1. In this Order "judgment" includes order, decision or direction.Drawing up judgments2. (1) Every judgment shall(a) subject to rules 3 and 7(1), be drawn up and signed by an officer of the appropriate office; and(b) be sealed and filed by an officer of that office and such officer shall at the time of filing enter such judgment in the record kept for the purpose and the date of filing shall be deemed to he the date of such entry.Statutory Declarations Act 1835Section 13 Justices not to administer oaths, &c. touching matters whereof they have no jurisdiction by statute. Proviso.It shall not be lawful for any justice of the peace or other person to administer or cause or allow to be administered, or to receive or cause or allow to be received, any oath, affidavit, or solemn affirmation touching any matter or thing whereof such justice or other person hath not jurisdiction or cognizance by some statute in force at the time being: Provided always, that nothing herein contained shall be construed to extend to any oath, affidavit, or solemn affirmation before any justice in any matter or thing touching the preservation of the peace, or the prosecution, trial, or punishment of offences, or touching any proceedings before either of the Houses of Parliament or any committee thereof respectively, nor to any oath, affidavit, or affirmation which may be required by the laws of any foreign country to give validity to instruments in writing designed to be used in such foreign countries respectively.Hope this helps.