China military camouflage Videos

I think they are having fun!

+Snarky White Guydin din  in some Chinese young kids new internet  languages means  little dixk , sorry

He is one of my students, a first-year English student. I few lessons ago we were talking about other words for dinner and I mentioned "supper", "banquet", and threw in "din-din" (a favorite informal dinner term I first heard in an old Jim Hutton movie, 1967 "Who's Minding the Mint"). Naturally he picked up on that word, but the rest of his English needs some work. Its cool. We got it.

+Federico Mouse home school, private school, public school, catholic school, online school, droping out, going to college, going to a trade school, going to a technical school, etc.

+Georgia Farmin' good to know, but education related things cannot be optional. How can someone who is being educated, choose how he/she is educated?

It isn't twice a year though, its year round during the school day.

We do! In the US its called JROTC, and I've been a proud cadet of my school's NJROTC (Navy JROTC) for all 4 years of high school!  But, just like anything else in the US it's not mandatory.

What's great about this isn't making more kids want to join the army (that won't be such an advantage in an advanced society), what's great, in my opinion, is that it teaches kids discipline and respect to authorities.My country (Argentina) needs mandatory military service like this, the youth is 越来越 uneducated and useless.

والله انت غبي لو انت تحترق بمكانه ماراح توقف من شدة حرارة القنبله المضئيه

fascinating.I have a type 07 paratrooper blue digital camo set just for fun. That one is even worse than the marine one you shared because its even brighter blue. Thanks for sharing

+CaptainCool07 //bbs.tiexue.net/post_9553743_1.html 不过看上去感觉还是太显眼

+Stav Taiwan

+Intus Facultas FFL- $200 for license, then $200 for tax stamp on every ffl item you purchase. totally legal as long as you don't live in a communist/controlled area. or hell, if you are even free enough to own a firearm...

+planetwalker i know... lol technically they are called silencers... that was their name from the beginning... 

Here are some sources that may help you if your still researching :https://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/national-firearms-act-firearms.html//www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2012/05/foghorn/ask-foghorn-how-to-buy-a-silencer///truthaboutguns-zippykid.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/2012-05-05_16-12-30_734r2-734x900.jpg

+rascalMatt17 1. The ATF call it a silencer as do many other countries.2. The engineering or scientific terminology for it would be a "baffle".Which European countries are you referring to ? (sources please)//www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2012/05/foghorn/ask-foghorn-how-to-buy-a-silencer/

I'm going on the record right here and now and calling your character into question. What NFL team do you support ?

Everything you said in the first half of your "argument" was completely ad hominem, so I'm not even going to go into that. As for the rest of your "argument", tossing out all the "insulting" fluff, I didn't mention the short barreled rifle because I agree that is unconstitutional. As for invasion of privacy? That sounds remarkably non sequitur with the rest of your argument so it's hardly a reasonable argument. I have every intention of responding because I know I have an education that allows me to speak reasonably, and as such am entitled to speak my opinion. Either learn to respond properly in turn, or stop bringing yourself even lower by trying to argue with my points through insults to my character (that's what ad hominem means, since I'm guessing you didn't know)

+Intus Facultas You're incredibly stupid.  Throwing out some Latin jibberish doesn't do anything to help you. You come across as a real lame ass. The fact remains. The tax stamp is unjust. Not only that but it's an invasion of privacy. A short barreled rifle is a firearm. What do you have to say about that nitwit ? Wait, don't say anything. I wholeheartedly believe that we're all a lot better off if we don't read any more of your drivel.

+rascalMatt17 I asked a legitimate question, and was actually being nice, but since you decided to amp up the attitude, I'll return the favor. Allow me to explain to you one simplistic fact, for your simplistic mind as you put it. A suppressor is not a firearm. It does not fire a projectile using any sort of explosive device, nor is it capable of being used as such. Hence the right to bear ARMS does not extend to accessory not needed to actually fire a firearm.  As for your last sentence, this is what is known amongst educated circles as a reducto ad absurdum fallacy so I won't even bother to address it as a result.

+Intus Facultas Everyone in the firearms community considers the tax stamps you have to pay for, a government scam. It's 200 dollars for every single tax stamp you have to get and you have to get one for every suppressor, short barreled rifle etc that you buy. It's a tax that's unfair and excessive and there's no real reason to have it. If you believe in the RIGHT to bear arms then it goes without saying that that RIGHT shouldn't be infringed by heavy, unjust taxation. VERY SIMPLE LOGIC for your very simple mind.  I suppose if the government used your logic we'd have 200 dollar tax stamps on just about everything since our right to buy groceries, airline tickets, concert tickets etc at a fair price isn't covered in the constitution either.

+rascalMatt17 Thank you for the vocabulary correction, not really sure why the fee is unconstitutional since the constitution doesn't mention suppressors, only the right to bear arms. 

First off, they're not "silencers" the correct terminology is "suppressor". 2nd, if you fill out a form and send it in to the ATF along with the unconstitutional fee of $200.00 to acquire a tax stamp you can legally own a suppressor. Shooting suppressed will save your hearing. In many European countries that allow firearms, shooting unsupressed is considered bad etiquette.

no not in certain states with a special permit

+Mclelland J north Korea+civilian cargo= imagination

+alex elias North Korea also has large loads of civil cargo that sometimes need to be transported by aircraft, that is a thing with all nations.

lol.. civilian cargo..

+Frosty yeah i mean, that is virtually unconcibable

+Matias Figini apparently it's also impossible for them to load a few active bombs into the cargo bay

You're right, all RWJ does is make shitty jokes and use shitty cutouts.

...but what about planes located on concrete like the ones in the pictures? 

Also, the camo for cargo planes is only used from the belly and up, the plane is actually a light blue/gray on the belly, so.... seen from below, the camo is actually not that easily spotted.

true plus when the plane is landed, it is easier to hide

not that it matters, but F22 heat seeking missles from 80miles out should take care of any of those planes